The future of law-breaking prospect investigating is cat pelt , I think . 🐈
admonition : This place talk over serious topics , include mention of death , bodily harm , and murder . Please proceed with care .
1.If you’ve ever owned a cat, you know it seems like cat fur gets literallyeverywhere. As it turns out, that includes crime scenes. In 2013, David Hilder was found guilty of dismembering his friend David Guy’s body. Ultimately, one of the biggest pieces of evidence was that traces of hair from Hilder’s cat were found with the body.
According toBBC, Hilder wrapped Guy’s torso in trash bags and a curtain — the latter of which had cat hairs on it that matched Hilder’s cat. They also found traces of blood in Hilder’s home as well as fibers from the curtain.
2.There’s a whole field — Forensic Botany and Ecology — that works to solve cases using evidence left behind by plants. In 2005, forensic botanist and ecologist Patricia Wiltshire found crucial evidence that helped convict Ian Huntley of the murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman — and it was all thanks to some pollen.
According tothe Guardian, Patricia was able to identify the path Ian took by noticing that a new sideshoot of nettles was growing in a path toward the ditch in which the bodies were found. As it turns out, the sideshoots only grow after they’ve been stepped on. Based on their growth, she could even tell that the plants had been stepped on — and the bodies had been disposed of —13 and a half days prior. Further, Patricia was able to tie it to Ian because the pollen from the flowers was found on his shoes and car.
3.In the 1828,Mrs. Martenbegan having oddly specific dreams about her step-daughter, Maria, being murdered and buried in a red barn. Maria had eloped with a man named William. The night she left, Maria headed to the Red Barn — a landmark in Polstead, England — to meet him. For almost a year after, the Martens had not received a single letter or visit from Maria, and William — who was in contact with the family — continued to make excuses for her. Eventually, Mrs. Marten grew so worried, she told her husband about her dreams.
After some time, Mr. Marten and a friend went to the Red Barn at his wife’s urging. While searching, they noticed a loose part of the floor. Opening it, they found what looked like a body wrapped in a sack, with a green handkerchief. Mr. Marten returned home to ask his wife what color scarf Maria had left in. She confirmed that the scarf was, in fact, green.
As it turns out, the body was Maria’s. William initially told investigators he didn’t know a Maria, but ultimately, he was found guilty for the crime.
you may take more about this casehere .
4.In July of 2003, the murder of five family members was solved with the help of an entomology professor —Lynn Kimsey of UC Davis, who was asked to identify dead bugs on a car.
The prime suspect — Vincent Brothers — had been arrested under suspicion, as the victims were his estranged wife, three kids, and mother-in-law. However, he claimed to have been in Ohio at the time. Still, investigators believed that Vincent had rented a car, drove from Ohio to California, and committed the murders. With the help of Professor Kimsey, they were able to prove it. Kimsey explained that there were several species of insects found on the car that were only found in the west, and some which were particularly abundant in California. The bugs found also suggested that it was driven at night. Between this evidence and 4,500 miles on the rental car that were unaccounted for, Vincent was ultimatelyfound guilty.
you’re able to read more about the casehere .
5.In 1980, Etta Louise Smith had a “vision” of the body of Melanie Uribe — a missing nurse — in Lopez Canyon. Shedid notconsider herself to be a psychic of any sorts, but — after hearing about Melanie — believed she knew something crucial. She told police what she’d seen, but wasn’t taken seriously. 45 minutes later, she went searching with family members to find the body herself. After leading police to the exact spot, they questioned her for 10 hours, then arrested her for suspicion of murder. She was released when three men were arrested for the crime, and in turn sued the police for false arrest and won.
6.In 2005, Janet Abaroa was found dead in her home. Her husband, Raven, claimed that Janet had been watching TV in bed that night when he left for a soccer game. While his alibi held up at first, five years later, Detective Charles Sole was able to disprove it with a single pair of contact lenses.
According toBuzzFeed News, Janet’s friends and family told investigators that, like clockwork, Janet took her contact lenses out every night before she watched TV. However, they were never able to find her contact lenses at the crime scene. Charles had the body exhumed, and — as it turns out — she had still been wearing the contacts when she died. This proved Raven had been lying about what both he and Janet had been doing that night. While the evidence wasn’t the be-all-end-all of the case, Raven eventually took an Alford plea, knowing that, overall, the prosecutors probably had enough evidence to convict him.
7.In 2007, a three-year-old cold case was solved by a prison inmate using playing cards. Two years earlier, special agentTommy Raycame up with the idea to put information about and photos of victims from unsolved homicide and missing persons cases on playing cards. The goal here was to hand decks of them out in Florida prisons and see if inmates could provide new leads on these unsolved cases. And, they did.
One such case is that of James Foote. James was shot in a Fort Myers parking lot in 2004. A photo of James and details about his case were written on the seven of clubs card. An inmate came forward, telling investigators that a fellow inmate, Derrick L. Hamilton, bragged about having killed James. Ultimately, he waschargedwith felony murder.
you’re able to learn more about the deck of cards of cardshere .