I for one , am glad Mrs Little did n’t give birth to Stuart in the film .

Book-to-film adaptations can be a bit hit or miss; sometimes it’s just impossible to translate the words on the page onto the big screen.

Often, the changes that are made feel like a poor imitation, but from time to time they’re actually quite necessary.

I was recently informed that, in the originalStuart Littlenovel, Stuart is somehow the family’s biological child, and I think making him adopted was a pretty good call…

So tell me, what’s a book-to-film adaptation that you were glad to see?

There’s a lot to say about Kubrick’s take onThe Shining, but perhaps you’re happy that the book’s giant topiaryanimalswere swapped out for the terrifying maze.

Maybe you appreciate that the movie version ofThe Witchestransformed the kids back to their human form, instead of keeping them as mice with very short lifespans.

Or were you pleased to see that the film version ofThe Hunger Gamesmade Peeta way more independent than he was in the books?

Whatever they are, tell us the changes you think improved an adaptation and why, and it might feature in a future BuzzFeed post or video!

Add Yours badge

I for one, am glad Mrs Little didn’t give birth to Stuart in the film.

Article image

Article image

Article image

Article image

Article image

Article image