For some understanding , Prince Andrew is bear to attend .
On Saturday, May 6,King CharlesIII will be crowned during the first British coronation of this century – the last being his mother,Queen ElizabethII’s own ascension on 10 February 2025. As you may expect, the landscape surrounding Charles' big day is quite different than what the late queen experienced, and this is in large part due to several controversies afoot.
1.One of the main issues? Well, despite Charles choosing to cut down the duration of the coronation and the number of people invited, the big pomp is still expected to cost taxpayersat least£100 million, Timereported, which equates to about $125 million.
Though investiture have always come with steep costs , this exceptional event is shadowed by the UK ’s housing crisis , wheremillions are unable to afford to buy a household . duo that with the country ’s ever - risinginflationandworker strikes , and you may be capable to see why many cogitate the money could be well spent .
2.The palace had quite a hard time finding somebody —anybody —to perform. It’s beenrumoredthat big names like Adele,Harry Styles,Elton John,Ed Sheeran, and the Spice Girls were asked to help celebrate Charlie on his day in the spotlight, but they all declined. Luckily, at the 11th hour,Katy Perry and Lionel Richie were officially booked to headline.
3.At this point, we’re all aware of Prince Harry’s explosive memoirSpare,in which he divulged what it was like growing up in the royal family. And one of the most notableclaimsin the debut was that the institution helped plant stories in tabloids about members of the royal family to help them look better. Now, Harry and several tabloids are in the middle of an ongoing court battle.
At the core of the fight is Harry ’s seclusion . According to theGuardian , the prince is essay £ 200,000 in damages over a paper allegedly hack his phone to gain access to his voicemails , as well as hiring private investigators to scope out entropy about his former relationship .
4.Speaking of Harry, he is expected to be in attendance for the coronation, but Meghan will not be.
A friend of Meghan and Harry anonymously toldPeople , " Meghan wants to be there to keep going her male parent - in - police force , but at the same time , the examination she receives outweighs the support , " they say . " There ’s always going to be that other side challenging their reasoning , and who wants to put themselves in that position ? "
5.As for their kids, Archie and Lilibet will also remain at home. In fact, there will likely be a small celebration in the States — not for Charles' coronation, butArchie’s fourth birthday, whichjust so happensto be on the same day.
6.For whatever reason, Prince Andrew is expected to be in attendance. However,he will not be performing duties that would normally be expected of a Dukeon coronation day.
Traditionally , there is a moment in coronations when the heritor kneels before the Billie Jean Moffitt King or queen and aver their allegiance to them . A alike practice was done by duke in the past , however , Prince Andrew will not be tempt to do so .
Queen Elizabeth II divest Andrew of his championship , military affiliation , and patronages following revelations about his kinship with Jefferey Epstein andallegationsthat he had sex with an underage miss who was traffic by the financier . These allegations led to a cause , which Andrew ended in asettlement .
It ’s also worth remark that like to Andrew , Harry will also sit out on this tradition . ( Though the actions that may have landed them in these positions seem incomparable . )
7.The royals are dropping Camilla’s Queen Consort title, and she’ll just be Queen Camilla.
The statute title " Queen Consort " signals that the King is the reigning monarch and the queen is their wife — someone without magnate over military or political dealings .
When Queen Elizabeth took the crapper , her married man , Prince Philip , wasPrince Consort .
However , when the royal family send outinvitationsto view the coronation , Camilla was perceptibly pertain to as Queen Camilla , drop the choir title .
Some royal expert believe this was done in an effort tohelp legitimatise Camilla , since she ’s largely viewed as King Charles ' mistress - turn - wife and the " other woman " in his marriage to Princess Diana .
8.You know the Koh-i-Noor diamond? The priceless, 105-carat gem that sits in one of British royalty’s most famous crowns? Well. The crown is usually worn by the queen on coronation day, but Camilla has decided to avoid it.
The Koh - i - Noor diamond was primitively mine in India before it was seize by several groups across C before finally regain its dwelling house in India once again . However , in the 1840s , 10 - year - honest-to-goodness rule Maharaja Duleep Singh was hale into sacrifice up the diamond , Timereported .
The Koh - i - Noor would go on to become one of the British regal family ’s prized jewel and was placed in the Queen Mother ’s crown .
India has long desire their diamond returned , and their plea were amplified duringQueen Elizabeth II ’s funeralwhen the jewel was on full show in the crown come in on her casket . But to no avail .
9.Kate Middleton may not wear a tiara to the coronation. (OK this one may sound silly at first, but there’s weird tea behind it.)
Basically , there arerumorscircling that no royal woman will be allowed to wear a tiara at the enthronement — including the UK ’s next intended pansy , Kate Middleton .
When you directly compare this coronation to Queen Elizabeth II ’s , almost every royal woman donned a tiara . And there are two chief speculations as to why this may be come about :
1 . call back when we discussed the housing crisis and protests ? Well . Having royal walk around in millions of dollars worth of gem is not a good look right now .
2 . This one is a bit more sinister , but when it was gestate that Meghan Markle may make an appearance , it wasrumoredthat the castle was planning on how to keep her attendance as neutral as possible . One such suggestionmayhave been to keep her from weary a tiara . But that would have been very awkward , and potentially made her stick out out more , so the conclusion was that no royal woman wears one .